A growing jewelry trend has sparked controversy, as an IVF-based business offers customers keepsakes made from discarded embryos, raising serious ethical concerns.
Blossom Keepsake, a jewelry company that has taken to Instagram to advertise its line of “embryo jewelry,” has caused an outcry by transforming the remains of unwanted embryonic children into necklaces, rings, and other accessories. This has drawn significant backlash from social media users, ethical groups, and individuals invested in the rights of the unborn.
The business, which capitalizes on the emotional connection between parents and their embryos, uses leftover or discarded embryos from in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures to create keepsake jewelry. The practice is especially disturbing as embryos are often “discarded or donated” following failed implantation attempts, which statistics show is the reality for over 80% of IVF-created embryos, according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Though IVF is largely framed as a means to help couples struggling with fertility, it has become increasingly clear that a significant number of embryos end up not being implanted, abandoned in storage, or disposed of, creating an ethical dilemma. The decision to use these embryos for commercial gain is now being questioned, especially as the jewelry business turns them into tangible products. The ethical question arises: Are we commodifying human life at its earliest stage?
This is more than just a story about fertility treatments. It’s a conversation about the devaluation of human life. The controversy centers around whether human embryos—tiny but undeniably living beings—should be reduced to mere jewelry. By transforming embryos into wearable accessories, we are being reminded of the disturbing trend of treating human life as disposable for profit. Blossom Keepsake has sparked outrage online, with users arguing that turning embryos into keepsakes trivializes the sanctity of life.
Critics also point out the slippery slope of commercializing human remains. Whether it’s selling embryonic tissue, creating jewelry from discarded embryos, or profiting from stem cell research, these practices may contribute to the normalization of treating life based on its “usefulness” or “value.”
The outrage reached a peak when individuals on Instagram commented on the immorality of profiting from human death. The company quickly blocked those who criticized the practice, which only further ignited the debate. In their defense, the company attempted to explain their actions, but many still felt that the jewelry was disrespectful and commodified life in a way that crosses ethical boundaries.
Read more:
